Current Interventions in Autism - A
Brief Analysis
Polly A. Yarnall, M.Ed. Adocate, Autism Society of America; Nov
- Dec 2000; pg 26, 27
|
This chart is a
simplified explanation and comparison of approaches currently in common
practice. |
|
|
Background |
|
|
Lovaas |
also
known as Discrete Trial (DT), Intensive Behavior Intervention (IBI), Applied
Behavior Analysis (ABA); DT was earliest form of behavior modification;
initial research reported in 1987; initial intent to achieve inclusive
kindergarten readiness; has "morphed" into IBI and ABA. |
|
TEACCH |
stands
for Treatment and Education of Autistic and related Communication- handicapped
Children; over 32 years empirical data on efficacy of TEACCH approach exists;
includes parents as co-therapists; recognizes need for supports from early
childhood through adulthood; main focus is on autism rather than behavior. |
|
PECS |
stands
for Picture Exchange Communication System; derived from need to differentiate
between talking and communicating; combines in-depth knowledge of speech
therapy with understanding of communication where student does not typically
attach meaning to words and lack of understanding of communication exists;
high compatibility with TEACCH. |
|
Greenspan |
also
known as "Floor Time"; DIR (Developmental Individual-Difference
Relationship-Based) Model; targets emotional development following
developmental model; depends on informed and acute observations of child to
determine current level of functioning; has child-centered focus; builds from
the child "Floor Time" is only one piece of a three-part model that
also includes spontaneity along with semi-structured play, and motor and
sensory play. |
|
Inclusion |
initially
intended for children with mental retardation and disabilities other than
autism; sociological, educational, and political mandates in contrast to
psychology as root source for other approaches; inclusion defined in three
federal laws - PL 94-142, REI, and IDEA. |
|
Social |
also
known as Social Scripts; developed by Carol Gray in 1991 initially to help
student with autism understand rules of a game; was further developed to
address understanding subtle social rules of "neurotypical"
culture; addresses " Theory of Mind" deficits (the ability to take
the perspective of another person). |
|
Goals |
|
|
Lovaas |
teach
child haw to learn by focusing on developing skills in attending, imitation,
receptive/ expressive language, pre-academics, and self-help. |
|
TEACCH |
provide
strategies that support person throughout lifespan; facilitate autonomy at
all levels of functioning; can be accommodated to individual needs. |
|
PECS |
help
child spontaneously initiate communicative interaction; help child understand
the function of communication; develop communicative competency. |
|
Greenspan |
targets
personal interactions to facilitate mastery of developmental skills; helps
professionals see child as functionally integrated and connected; does not
treat in separate pieces for speech development, motor development, etc. |
|
Inclusion |
educate
children with disabilities with NT children to the maximum extent possible;
educate children with disabilities in the chronological setting they would be
in if they had no disability and they lived at home; does not apply separate
educational channels except under specific circumstances. |
|
Social |
clarify
social expectations for students with ASD; address issues from the student's
perspective; redefine social misinterpretations; provide a guide for conduct
or self-management in specific social situations. |
|
How Implemented |
|
|
Lovaas |
uses ABC
model; every trial or task given to the child consists of: antecedent - a
directive or request for child to perform an action, behavior - a response
from the child that may include successful performance, non-compliance, no
response, consequence - a reaction from the therapist, including a range of
responses from strong positive reinforcement to faint praise to a negative "No!",
pause - to separate trials from one another (intertrial interval). |
|
TEACCH |
clearly
organized, structured, modified environments and activities; emphasis on
visual learning modalities; uses functional contexts for teaching concepts;
curriculum is individualized based on individual assessment; uses structure
and predictability to promote spontaneous communication. |
|
PECS |
recognizes
that young children with autism are not strongly influenced by social
rewards; training begins with functional acts that bring child into contact
with rewards; begins with physically assisted exchanges and proceeds through
a hierarchy of eight phases; requires initial ratio of 2:1. |
|
Greenspan |
teaches
in interactive contexts; addresses developmental delays in sensory modulation
motor planning and sequencing, and perceptual processing; usually done in
20-minute segments followed by 20-minute breaks, each segment addressing one
each of above-identified delays. |
|
Inclusion |
children
with autism typically placed in inclusive settings with 1:1 aide; curriculum
modified to accommodate to specific learning strengths and deficits; requires
team approach to planning; approach may be selective inclusion (by subject
matter or class), partial inclusion ( ½ day included, ½ day separate instruction),
or full, radical inclusion with no exceptions. |
|
Social |
stories
or scripts are specific to the person, addressing situations which are
problematic for that individual; Social Stories typically comprised of three
types of sentences: perspective, descriptive, and directive; types of
sentences follow a ratio for frequency of inclusion in the Social Story;
Social Story can be read TO or BY the person with autism; introduced far
enough in advance of situation to allow multiple readings, but especially
just before the situation is to occur. |
|
Reported Outcomes |
|
|
Lovaas |
first
replications of initial research reporting gains in IQ, language
comprehension and expression, adaptive and social skills. |
|
TEACCH |
gains in
function and development; improved adaptation and increase in functional
skills; learned skills generalized to other environments; North Carolina
reports lowest parental stress rates and rate of requests for out-of-home
placement, and highest successful employment rates. |
|
PECS |
Pyramid
Educational Consultants report incoming empirical data supporting: increased
communicative competency among users (children understanding the function of
communication); increasing reports of emerging spontaneous speech. |
|
Greenspan |
teaches
parents how to engage child in happier, more relaxed ways; hypothetically
lays stronger framework for future neurological/ cognitive development. |
|
Inclusion |
in
certain circumstances, some children with autism can survive and even become
more social in classrooms with NT peers; benefits children who cognitively
match classmates. |
|
Social |
stabilization
of behavior specific to the situation being addressed; reduction in
frustration and anxiety of students; improved behavior when approach is
consistently implemented. |
|
Advantages of Approach |
|
|
Lovaas |
recognizes
need for 1:1 instruction; utilizes repetitions of learned responses until
firmly imbedded; tends to keep child engaged for increasing periods of time;
effective at eliciting verbal production in select children; is a "jump
start" fur many children, with best outcomes for those in
mild-to-moderate range. |
|
TEACCH |
dynamic
model that takes advantage of and incorporates research from multiple fields;
model does not remain static; anticipates and supports inclusive strategies;
compatible with PECS, Floor Time, OT, PT, selected therapies; addresses
sub-types of autism, using individualized assessment and approach; identifies
emerging skills, with highest probability of success; modifiable to reduce
stress on child and/or family. |
|
PECS |
helps to
get language started; addresses both the communicative and social deficits of
autism; well-suited for pre-verbal and non-verbal children AND children with
a higher Performance IQ than Verbal IQ; semantics of PECS more like spoken
language than signing. |
|
Greenspan |
addresses
emotional development in contrast to other approaches, which tend to focus on
cognitive development; avoidswhich feeds child'sin deficit areas, drilling
frustrations and highlights inadequacies; is a non-threatening approach;
helps to turn child's actions into interactions. |
|
Inclusion |
more
opportunities for role modeling and social interaction; greater exposure to
verbal communication; opportunities for of and peers to gain greater
understanding tolerance for differences; greater opportunities for
friendships with typically developing peers. |
|
Social |
developed
specifically to address autistic social deficits; tailored to individual and
specific needs; is time and cost efficient/flexible. |
|
Concerns with Approach |
|
|
Lovaas |
heavily
promoted as THE approach for autism in absence of any comparative research to
support claim; no differentiation for subtypes when creating curriculum;
emphasizes compliance training, prompt dependence; heavy focus on behavioral
approach may ignore underlying neurological aspects of autism, including
issues of executive function and attention switching; may overstress child
and/or family; costs reported as high as $50,000 per child per year;
prohibits equal access. |
|
TEACCH |
belief
that TEACCH "gives in" to autism rather than fighting it; seen by
some as an exclusionary approach that segregates children with autism; does
not place enough emphasis on communication and social development;
independent work centers may isolate when there is a need to be with other
children to develop social skills. |
|
PECS |
may
suppress spoken language (evidence is to the contrary). |
|
Greenspan |
does not
focus on specific areas for competency; no research to support efficacy for
children with autism; approach based on hypotheses, not, research; is a more
passive approach. |
|
Inclusion |
automatic
inclusion violates spirit and letter of IDEA; opportunities for successful
inclusion begin to plateau by end of third grade as work becomes more
abstract and faster paced; increasing use of language-based instruction puts
students with autism at great disadvantage; sensory and processing
difficulties tend to be insufficiently accommodated; regular education
setting not necessarily best learning environment for students with autism;
teachers and students in inclusion classrooms are typically ill prepared to
receive student. |
|
Social |
supportive
data is anecdotal rather than empirical; benefit depends on skill of writer
and writer's understanding of autism, as well as writer's ability to take an
autistic perspective. |
|
Errors to Avoid |
|
|
Lovaas |
creating
dependency on 1:1; overstressing child or family interpreting all behaviors
as willful rather than neurological manifestations of syndrome; ignoring
sensory issues or processing difficulties; failing to recognize when it is
time to move to another approach. |
|
TEACCH |
failing
to offer sufficient training, consultancy, and follow-up training to teachers
for program to be properly implemented; treating TEACCH as a single classroom
approach rather than a comprehensive continuum of supports and strategies;
expecting minimally trained teacher to inform and train all other personnel
in TEACCH approach; failing work collaboratively with parents. |
|
PECS |
failing
to strictly adhere to the teaching principals in Phase I; tendency to rush
through Phase I or to use only one trainer; providing inadequate support or
follow-up for teacher after attending two-day training; training only one
person in approach rather than all classroom personnel; inconsistently
implementing in classroom. |
|
Greenspan |
attempting
to implement approach without training or professional oversight; taking the
lead, trying to get the child to do what YOU think he should do; allowing
inadequate time; attempting to implement in midst of ongoing activities for
other children. |
|
Inclusion |
providing
insufficient training, preparation, information, and support to personnel;
placing student in settings where level of auditory and visual stimulation is
typically too intense; assigning student work in which cognitive demands
exceed student's ability to comprehend; depending on support of 1:1 aide;
maintaining placement in face of frequent or severe disruptive behaviors;
focusing on academics to detriment or exclusion of functional competencies;
not offering multiple opportunities to apply functional skills. |
|
Social |
including
too many directive sentences in proportion to perspective and descriptive
sentences; stating directive sentences in inflexible terms (e.g., "I
will do" rather than "I will try to "); writing above the
person's cognitive developmental age; using complex language; not being
specific enough in describing either the situation or the desired behavioral
response. |